Tuesday, January 8, 2008

When it's worth the wait.

The best place for coffee in Santa Cruz, if you can get beyond the reverential, museum-like atmosphere and slightly sour staff, is Lulu's at the Octagon. (Oooh, and look, Christina Waters agrees with me.) Want a cup of coffee? Select a bean from their menu of over twenty, and they weigh, grind, and brew your selection to order. It's a bit of a change to wait longer for a cup of coffee than an espresso drink, but it's worth it. My cup of Guatemala this morning, brewed in a French press because the electronic press was down, had a pleasing weight and viscosity, a near-chewiness, that I haven't encountered before. I know it's a little strange to talk about coffee in wine-snob terms, but the coffee from Lulu's demands it. It also demands a healthy glug of half-and-half, the only addition to coffee that elevates it beyond its natural state (excluding, perhaps, whipped cream). Black is fine, but you skim milk-ers, you two-cube-ers, you Splenda addicts, you soy aficionados, you are all lovely people I am sure, but you are bad at drinking coffee. Throw your fears of fat and dairy out the window and do a side-by-side, blind tasting. So good, right?

Right.

A note about the food writing in Santa Cruz: so bland! One writer describes the staff at Lulu's as "nice and knowledgeable," and calls the atmosphere "casual and sophisticated." Bah.

3 comments:

a-ro said...

I was caught by surprise when I paid 2 dollars for a small coffee at lulus and waited no less than 6 and a half weeks for it to be ready.
That said, it was a good cup.
In any case, the real issue here is the credibility given to Christina Waters' opinion.
It has none.

gastrognome said...

So what you're saying is, the "oooh" didn't convey the level of my sarcasm?

a-ro said...

That's pretty much what I'm saying, yeah. There's no room for irony when it comes to any reference to her. She should only be referenced with scorn and disapproval.